|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
In
production processes today information passes down through a series of
different corporate and decision-making levels to relay operations to
the “field”, i.e. the departments, starting from the heart of the
system, namely management.
At the top of the pyramid is ERP, part of the corporate management
system, which is now an indispensable tool enabling manufacturers to
classify and computerize business flows and logics. At the bottom are
the various departments, with their plant and machinery, PLCs,
instruments, paper, stores and supervision systems, all entities that
are equally important in guaranteeing perfect process control. Linking
these two different areas of business within the same company is
strategic for the survival of the business itself. Controlling the
logical and physical process links, identifying those in charge of each
piece of information and controlling synchronisation from the bottom up,
and vice versa, means reducing inefficiencies, increasing quality and
reducing wastage, including hidden costs. |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
We are
clearly not referring here to evident costs, which have obviously been
eliminated; we refer to the numerous little wastages that we do not
eliminate simply because we are unaware of their existence. Recovering
efficiency can no longer involve a single major point of improvement
because if we had not made it a long time ago we would not be in the
marketplace now. |
| |
|
Our
experience working with numerous tap manufacturers, mechanical
workshops, die-casting and moulding bays has taught us that an effective
and significant recovery in efficiency is the result of the combination
of numerous tiny efforts in many areas of the production process
(rejects, production and tooling times, maintenance, factory logistics,
up-to-date production standards and much more besides). |
| |
|
 |
| |
|
Let us
present a classic example. We often tend to forget that the incidence of
micro-stoppages is important if we are to achieve a clear improvement in
efficiency. If a machine stops for longer than an hour or so, every one
knows about it, but if the cycle time is increased by a mere 3 seconds
per minute due to contingent process requirements and then someone
forgets to go back to the standard time, you will only discover it much
later when you look at the printouts the following day and the loss is
5% of the total shift output. |
| |
|
There
are many other similar examples that can be quoted: exact cost
allocation to a job order based on known, non-standard data; automatic
real-time recording of the number of items produced and the time taken
to do so, allowing accurate planning; definite answers to customers
regarding stock availability; elimination of paper, paperwork and
transcription errors. You will undoubtedly be able to think up other
examples more relevant to your own business. |
| |
|
STAIN’s
answer to the question of how to increase profit margins is a simple one
that can be summarized in the following statement: “We must relay
details of what we have produced at the same rate at which the products
pass through the various departments, and with the same accuracy and
precision with which we are good at making them.” |
| |
|
STAIN
products provide an invaluable LENS and GAUGE. The LENS is used to “see”
the hidden costs concealed in production processes, and establish
suitable measures to be taken to eliminate them. The GAUGE is used to
“measure” in real time whether organisational and technological
improvements have effectively increased productivity by machine,
department, article or job order. |
| |
|
This is
clearly not merely a technological intervention, it is based on four
interdependent factors: technology, organisation, information and
change. |
| |
|
It is
very important to choose a partner that can work competently and has
proved it possesses specific skills in this area, one that can provide
clients with invaluable experience in terms of organisation, technology
and, more importantly, method. The partner is of fundamental
importance when acting on the variables of technology, information and
consulting, whereas the variables of organisation and change must be
controlled by the Client, who must be firmly convinced that having
definite information in real time and collected automatically from the
plant and machinery provides an invaluable means for increasing profit
margins. |
| |
|
We
would like to mention just some of the main advantages that have
resulted in major improvements in our clients’ productivity margins
following the identification of hidden costs using STAIN’s MES
solutions: |
|
|
-
Automatic recording of times and OK parts and rejects, with exact
costing for each stage.
-
In-line inventorying, with stock reduction and the elimination of
physical inventory times and costs.
-
Reutilisation for other tasks of human resources previously used for
manual production processes.
-
Total elimination of transcription errors and omissions since field
production reports no longer need to be compiled by hand.
-
Real-time updating of work progress and stocks, giving optimised
scheduling and reduced delays in deliveries.
-
Complete traceability of each container back to casting of the raw
material in the event of non-conformities.
-
Recovery of financial resources to minimize stocks of unfinished
products (WIP).
-
Recovery of financial resources and reduction in machine stoppages,
with computerized tool management (moulds, matrices, blocks, plugs,
etc.)
-
Increased awareness of global company indicators by heads of
department.
-
Shorter stoppages thanks to an accurate identification of causes.
|
|
We are
firmly convinced that people and their experience are the most important
resource for a company today, which is why they should not waste time
trying to “interpret” hand-written information on work sheets – they
should spend their time improving processes in order to increase margins
and guarantee a future for the company. |
| |